Legal Opinion

Stratton v. Abington Mutual Fire Insurance

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided February 3, 1987No. 4264PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBieluch, J.

This is an action to collect damages under a homeowner’s insurance policy. The plaintiff has appealed from the judgment rendered for the named defendant,1 in accordance with the report of the attorney trial referee. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the trial court erred in sustaining the referee’s finding that the defendant had established its special defense that the insurance policy had been effectively cancelled by the defendant prior to the plaintiff’s loss.

The plaintiff asserts that the notice of cancellation clause in the insurance policy was ambiguous and, therefore, should have…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cahill v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  2. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. ColeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  3. Westmoreland v. General Accident F. & L. Assurance CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
  4. DiSimone v. VitelloConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
  5. Long v. Home Indemnity Co. of New YorkLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Scoville v. Shop-Rite Supermarkets, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  2. Maine Bonding & Casualty Co. v. KnowltonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
  3. Lee v. AIG Casualty Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2013
  4. Canal Insurance Company v. Haniewski, No. 417942 (Jul. 26, 2000)Connecticut Superior Court · 2000
  5. National Mortgage Company v. Hasan, No. Cv94 031 83 56 S (Aug. 14, 1996)Connecticut Superior Court · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API