Legal Opinion

DiSimone v. Vitello

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 11, 1986No. 3551PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from the trial court’s denial of the defendants’ motion to set aside a default judgment rendered, after a hearing in damages, more than three years earlier. The defendants claim that the denial of their motion was improper because (1) they did not receive notice of the judgment as required by Practice Book § 354, (2) the Superior Court clerk’s office failed to provide the defendants with notice of the hearing in damages in accordance with Practice Book § 368, (3) the hearing in damages was held in violation of General Statutes § 52-221, thereby preventing the defendants from…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Steve Viglione Sheet Metal Co. v. SakonchickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. Broaca v. BroacaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  3. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. ColeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  4. Van Mecklenburg v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  5. Yanow v. Teal Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Batory v. BajorConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
  2. Henriquez v. AllegreConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  3. Noethe v. NoetheConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
  4. Habura v. KochanowiczConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  5. Morelli v. Manpower, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1994

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API