Legal Opinion

Westmoreland v. General Accident F. & L. Assurance Corporation

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 19, 1957PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*267Iítglis, C. J.

In tills action the plaintiff seeks to recover from the defendant as his insurer under a policy covering damage to his automobile by collision. The question involved is whether the defendant had effectively canceled the policy prior to the date of the collision in which the plaintiff’s car was damaged.

The ffnciing made by the trial court is not attacked except as to the conclusions set forth therein. The subordinate facts as found, so far as they are material to the issues on this appeal, are the following: On April 13,1954, the defendant issued to the plaintiff a policy…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Trinity Universal Insurance v. WillrichWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Medford v. Pacific National Fire InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Wallace v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Boyle v. Inter Insurance ExchangeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1948
  5. Kamille v. Home Fire & Marine InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1925

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Griswold v. Union Labor Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. Farmers Insurance Group v. MerryweatherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  3. Employers Mutual Casualty Co. v. NosserMississippi Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Koehn v. Central National InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  5. Seven Fifty Main Street Associates Ltd. Partnership v. SpectorConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API