Legal Opinion

Maine Bonding & Casualty Co. v. Knowlton

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided November 1, 1991PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLLINS, Justice.

Kevin and Debra Knowlton (“the Knowl-tons”) and Edward Martel appeal from a Superior Court (York County, Brennan, J.) summary judgment declaring that the plaintiff, Maine Bonding and Casualty Company (“the Insurer”) is not required to defend or indemnify the Knowltons in a personal injury suit brought by Martel. The Superior Court found that the Insurer’s notice of cancellation, although defective under the governing statute, effected a termination of the Knowltons’ policy sometime before the date of Martel's injury. Because we interpret the statute differently, we vacate and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Henry Farber and Sam Levy, Third-Party v. Great American Insurance Company, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
  2. Raymond v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  3. Insurance Management Inc. v. GuptillCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976
  4. Moore v. Vernon Fire & Casualty InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. Campbell v. Home Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Grubbs v. Credit General InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  2. Corinth Pellets, LLC v. Arch Specialty Insurance Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2021
  3. Valley Forge Insurance v. Concord Group InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
  4. Catherine Dudley v. Hudson Specialty Insurance CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2026
  5. Jorgensen v. KnutsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API