Legal Opinion
Hunder Ex Rel. Hunder v. Rindlaub
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided August 22, 1931No. File No. 5895PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ChRistiaNsoN, Ck. J.
Plaintiff brought this action to recover damages against the defendants for alleged negligence in the treatment of an injured eye. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for $29,850.00. Judgment was entered upon the verdict and the defendants have appealed. It is alleged in the complaint that on February 6, 1927, the plaintiff, Donald Plunder, while whittling a piece of wood, pierced his left eye with the blade of a knife and thereby seriously injured such eye; that thereupon and on the same day the father and mother of said Donald Plunder took him to the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Raub v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Pyke v. City of JamestownNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906
- Hitchcock v. BurgettMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Boeck v. BoeckIdaho Supreme Court · 1916
- Kinney v. Brotherhood of American YeomenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- McDermott v. Manhattan Eye, Ear & Throat HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1964
- Iverson v. LancasterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
- Lembke v. UnkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
- Anderson v. FlorenceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Duling v. Bluefield Sanitarium, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1965
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.