Legal Opinion

McDermott v. Manhattan Eye, Ear & Throat Hospital

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 25, 1964PublishedCited by 120 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFuld, J.

The only important question posed by this appeal, one of first impression in this State, concerns the right of a plaintiff in a malpractice suit to call a doctor against whom she brought the action and question him as a medical expert.

The plaintiff, Kathleen McDermott, was for many years aware that she was suffering in both eyes from some corneal disease and had, on a number of occasions, consulted with various physicians with reference to her condition and been advised of the possible merits of a corneal transplant. In August of 1957, she visited Dr. Schachat, an ophthalmologist, who…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Meiselman v. Crown Heights Hospital, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. Lawless v. CalawayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Benson v. . DeanNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  4. People Ex Rel. Kraushaar Bros. & Co. v. ThorpeNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
  5. Snyder v. PantaleoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by120 opinions

  1. Wilkinson v. VeseySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1972
  2. Wilson v. ScottTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Lipsius v. WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  4. Iverson v. LancasterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Kenneth E. Sitts v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987

115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API