Legal Opinion
Iverson v. Lancaster
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided April 25, 1968No. 8469, 8470PublishedCited by 85 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ERICKSTAD, Judge.
This opinion covers two causes of action. The first was brought by Florence J. Iverson as plaintiff against W. E. G. Lancaster, M.D., and the Fargo Clinic as defendants. The second was brought by Florence’s husband Howard as plaintiff against the same parties as defendants. The summonses were served on June 23, 1964, and the complaints on July 13, 1964.
The essence of both complaints is that Dr. Lancaster negligently failed to diag nose Mrs. Iverson’s condition of hypertension, commonly known as high blood pressure, as due to coarctation of the aorta ; that he advised her that…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Di Carlo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
- Berry v. BrannerOregon Supreme Court · 1966
- Lawless v. CalawayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Huysman v. KirschCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- McDermott v. Manhattan Eye, Ear & Throat HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1964
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by85 opinions
- Flanagan v. Mount Eden General HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Catz v. RubensteinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Bussineau v. President of Georgetown CollegeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- Lipsey v. Michael Reese HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
- Chrysler Corp. v. TodorovichWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.