Legal Opinion

Raub v. Carpenter

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 1, 1902No. 64PublishedCited by 65 opinions

ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. The case is stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Fullee

This is a writ of error to a- judgment of the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia, affirming certain orders of the Supreme Court of the District, holding a special term for orphans’ court business, admitting a will and codicil, to probate and granting letters testamentary thereon; and denying a motion to ivaoate that decree.

Plaintiffs in error filed a caveat to the probate and record of the writings, purporting to be the will and codicil, and issues, addressed to both, as to mental capacity, fraud or coercion, and undue influence, were framed for trial by jury.

Trial,was had, and on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kohl v. LehlbackSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Towson v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1899

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Frazier v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. United States v. Jermaine Boney, United States of America v. Donald A. HollomanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
  3. United States v. Lawrence Daniel Caldwell, A/K/A Thomas E. Morgan, (Two Cases). United States of America v. Eros A. Timm, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
  4. Thomas H. Washington, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  5. Batson v. State Ex Rel. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API