Harrison v. Horton
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtCooper, P. J.
This appeal is from a judgment denying appellant’s application for a writ of mandamtis, to compel the respondent to audit a demand upon the treasury of the city and county of San Francisco for the salary of appellant, as assistant district attorney, for the month of July, 1906. It is conceded that there is money in the general fund in the treasury of the city and county of San Francisco sufficient to pay the claim; that such money has not been appropriated to the payment of any claim or demand upon the said treasury, and that proper demand has been made upon the respondent.
The respondent…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. MauriceU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Virginia · 1823
- Humbert v. DunnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Lewis v. WidberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Patton v. Board of Health Etc.California Supreme Court · 1899
- Murphy v. City of San Luis ObispoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- County of Los Angeles v. ByramCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Irish v. HahnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- State ex rel. Birdzell v. JorgensonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
- City & County of San Francisco v. MulcrevyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
- People v. San Bernardino High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.