Humbert v. Dunn
California Supreme Court
Application to the supreme court for a writ of mandate. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.
This is an application for a writ of mandate commanding the respondent, as controller of the state, to draw a warrant in favor of petitioner for the sum of two hundred dollars, claimed to be due the latter on account of salary as a member of the examining commission on rivers and harbors. The petition shows, in substance, that the petitioner is a duly appointed, qualified, and acting member of said commission; that, by virtue of his appointment, qualification, and acts as a member of said commission, there is due to him as salary for the month of November, 1889, the sum of two hundred…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People ex rel. McCauley & Tevis v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Ristine v. State ex rel. Board of Commissioners of the Sinking FundIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
- Proll v. DunnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by45 opinions
- Hopping v. Council of City of RichmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- White v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Leonardson v. MoonIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
- Menefee, State Treas. v. AskewSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- State ex rel. Norfolk Beet-Sugar Co. v. MooreNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.