Legal Opinion

Pickering v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1944No. L. A. 18843PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

By writ of review, George A. Pickering has challenged the recommendation of the Board of Governors of The State Bar in a disciplinary action.

In an order to show cause, the petitioner was charged with having violated his oath and duties as an attorney at law within the meaning of the Business and Professions Code, as the same are prescribed by sections 6067 and 6068, and committing acts involving moral turpitude, dishonesty and corruption within the meaning of section 6106, in that he prepared, signed and filed a complaint asserting facts he knew to be untrue. The petitioner denied…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Marsh v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Peck v. the State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Geibel v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Tapley v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Rohe v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Clark v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Giovanazzi v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Bockrath v. Aldrich Chemical Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Jackson v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Sodikoff v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API