Legal Opinion

Coviello v. State Bar of California

California Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1953No. L. A. 22621PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Petitioner was charged in two counts with violations of his oath and duties as an attorney and counselor at law (Bus. & Prof. Code, §§ 6103, 6067, 6068), and with the commission of acts involving moral turpitude and dishonesty. (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 6106.)

Count one. The local committee found that petitioner accepted professional employment from Mrs. Wiedmer with respect to a claim before the Industrial Accident Commission. The commission approved a compromise whereby Mrs. Wied-mer agreed to settle her claim for $765. From this amount the commission awarded petitioner a fee of $75.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Clark v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Goldstone v. the State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Barbee v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hustedt v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Saleeby v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Coviello v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Mrakich v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Linnick v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API