Legal Opinion

Martin v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1978No. L.A. 30797PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT.

This is a proceeding to review a recommendation of the Disciplinary Board of the State Bar of California that petitioner be suspended from the practice of law in this state for six months and be required to comply with the provisions of rule 955 of the California Rules of Court.

The disciplinary board unanimously adopted substantially all of the findings of the local administrative committee which had concluded that, in six separate matters, petitioner had “intentionally and knowingly placed herself in a position where her failure to perform the services for which she was…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bradpiece v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Segretti v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Himmel v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Bernstein v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Grove v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Giovanazzi v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Lawhorn v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Guzzetta v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Waysman v. State Bar of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Finch v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API