Legal Opinion

Lantz v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1931No. Docket No. L.A. 12386PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

The petitioner seeks a review by this court of the order of the board of bar governors recommending his disbarment as an attorney at law in this state, which order was based upon findings that the .charges brought against him by a complaint filed before the local administrative committee of Los Angeles County, by Harold Carlson, had been sustained. The basis of this complaint against petitioner involved his acts and conduct with relation to the property of Bertha Carlson Witt, sometimes Imown as Bertha Carlson and Bertha Schubert Witt, who was the mother of the said Harold Carlson,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Carlson v. LantzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  2. In re CoffeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Carlson v. LantzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Christopher v. CondogeorgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Lassen v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Hallinan v. Committee of Bar ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  2. In Re RothrockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. In Re HatchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Jacobs v. the State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  5. State v. HoranWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API