Legal Opinion

Smalley & Co. v. Emerson & Cuming, Inc.

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided September 30, 1992No. Civ. A. 90 N 745PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

NOTTINGHAM, District Judge.

Plaintiff Smalley & Company is a distributor of adhesives and sealants. Defendant Emerson & Cuming manufactures adhesives and sealants. Defendant distributes its products both directly and through distributors. In November 1987, plaintiff entered into a distributor agreement to sell defendant’s products. In January 1989 and again in September 1989, Thiokol Corporation, an aerospace company, issued a request for quotation to supply a certain adhesive manufactured by defendant. Thiokol awarded the two contracts to plaintiff. In March…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Amoco Rocmount Co. v. Anschutz Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  2. Exxon Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  3. Russell v. GTE Government Systems Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  4. Smalley & Company v. Emerson & Cuming, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  5. Stifflear v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1996

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API