Legal Opinion
Amoco Rocmount Co. v. Anschutz Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided September 13, 1993No. 92-8024, 92-8027PublishedCited by 77 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOGAN, Circuit Judge.
In No. 92-8024, defendant The Anschutz Corporation (Anschutz) appeals the judgment of the district court ruling that it breached a Unit Operating Agreement with plaintiffs Amoco Roemount Company (Amoco), Champlin Petroleum Company n/k/a Union Pacific Resources Company, and other working interest owners,1 and ordering it to pay damages of $29,824,113.31. In No. 92-8027, Amoco appeals the judgment of the same court finding in favor of Anschutz on a number of Anschutz’s counterclaims against it, and ordering Amoco to pay damages totalling $4,940,585.03.
I
This complex and…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Morrissey v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Jones v. DresselSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- Wheeler v. John Deere Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- Hertz Corp. v. FriendSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- United States v. McVeighCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Sweet Pea Marine, Ltd. v. APJ Marine, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- Coffey v. Freeport McMoran Copper & GoldCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Denver Homeless Out Loud v. Denver, ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.