Stifflear v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Justice QUINN. *
In this action under the Colorado Antitrust Act, plaintiff, Julie A. Stifflear, a class representative of indirect purchasers of infant formula in Colorado—i.e., purchasers of infant formula from retailers—appeals the district court’s dismissal of her complaint pursuant to C.R.C.P. 12(b)(5) for failing to state a claim for relief. We affirm the judgment of dismissal.
I
The facts are undisputed. Plaintiff is a resident of Colorado and during the period from January 1, 1980, to December 31, 1992, purchased infant formula indirectly from one or both of the defendants,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- California v. ARC America Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Kansas v. UtiliCorp United Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Dunlap v. Colorado Springs Cablevision, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Freeman Industries, LLC v. Eastman Chemical Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2005
- Hyde v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
- Robin Free and Renee Free v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Inc., and Mead Johnson & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Federal Trade Commission v. Mylan Laboratories, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1999
- Blewett v. Abbott LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.