Meerzon v. Erie Insurance
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Judge:
This appeal is from the order below confirming an arbitration award. Appellants contend that the lower court erred in refusing to set aside the award because (1) the court employed the wrong standard of review; and (2) considered under the proper standard of review, the arbitration panel erred in concluding that appellants had failed to prove that the vehicle that struck their car was uninsured. For the reasons that follow, we agree and, accordingly, we reverse the order below, we vacate the arbitration award, and we remand the case for proceedings consistent with this Opinion.
O…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Harleysville Mutual Casualty Co. v. BlumlingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Allstate Insurance v. FioravantiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- United Services Automobile Ass'n AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Adelman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Habecker v. Nationwide InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bricklayers of Western Pennsylvania Combined Funds, Inc. v. Scott's Development Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Ware v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Krakower v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Martin v. PMA GROUPSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- White v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeColorado Court of Appeals · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.