Ware v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
CERCONE, Judge:
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of appellant, Roberta Ware, which required appellee, United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company (“Fidelity”) to pay non-record costs and nominal counsel fees. For the reasons set forth below, we vacate the award and remand the case to the trial court.
Appellant sustained personal injuries as a result of a motor vehicle accident which occurred in February of 1981. On August 2, 1981, as part of her effort to obtain reimbursement for medical expenses incurred, Ms. Ware submitted to Fidelity a claim for professional services rendered by…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Reilly v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Rizzo v. HainesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Goodheart v. CaseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Feingold v. HillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Gossman v. Lower Chanceford Township Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Bethenergy Mines Inc. v. Commonwealth, Department of Environmental ProtectionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Jordan, E. v. PSUSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
- Rohm & Haas Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Waller Corp. v. Warren Plaza, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Jordan, E. v. PSUSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.