Legal Opinion

Martin v. PMA GROUP

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 7, 1992No. 462PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge.

This appeal is taken from the lower court order dated December 23, 1991, denying appellant’s petition to vacate an arbitration award. Appellant presents two issues. First, appellant claims that the lower court erred in refusing to apply the standard of review for arbitration awards as set forth in 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 7302. Appellant next contends that appellee’s failure to produce a written waiver as required by 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 1791 requires that the insurance policy be reformed to reflect $1,000,000 in uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage rather than $35,000 as stated in the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Popskyj v. Keystone InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Bowdren v. Aetna Life & CasualtySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Meerzon v. Erie InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Sun Co. (R&M) v. Pennsylvania Turnpike CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Caron v. Reliance InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Hartford Insurance v. O'MaraSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Cotterman v. Allstate InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Cigna Insurance v. SquiresSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API