Legal Opinion
Harleysville Mutual Casualty Co. v. Blumling
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 16, 1968No. Appeal, 191PublishedCited by 172 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice O’Brien,
Appellant, Francis J. Blumling, suffered serious personal injuries when he was involved in a collision with a motor vehicle being operated by one James Adams. At the time of the collision, appellant was operating a vehicle owned by his employer, Lockhart Iron & Steel Company. There is no dispute that the collision between the vehicles was caused by the negligence of Adams.
It is conceded that at the time of the collision, the Adams vehicle was not covered by a liability insurance policy. The Lockhart vehicle which appellant was operating was covered by a liability…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sellers v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1966
- Bryant v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1965
- Pattani v. Keystone InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Smith v. Pacific Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1965
- Katz v. American Motorist InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
3Cited by172 opinions
- Brakeman v. Potomac Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Utica Mutual Insurance v. ContriscianeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Pickering v. American Employers InsuranceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1971
- Bradley v. Mid-Century InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
- Motor Club of America Insurance v. PhillipsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
167 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.