Legal Opinion

Richmann v. Beach

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 12, 1926PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Graff, C. J.

—The prayer of plaintiff for judgment is predicated on a threshing bill. His petition is in different counts, alleging, respectively, express contract and quantum meruit. To so plead was the legal privilege of the plaintiff. Russell v. Clemens & Co., 196 Iowa 1121.

The cause was submitted to a jury on the theory of express contract. This was fully warranted, unless the primary evidence of the plaintiff on which the pleaded contract rests is within the purview of the Statute of Frauds, Section 11285, Paragraph 2, Code of 1924. In the last analysis, the issuable question is one of fact, and.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. KnappSupreme Court of Iowa · 1873
  2. Russell v. John Clemens & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  3. Miller v. AdamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  4. Anderson v. LemkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  5. Townsend v. WhiteSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kladivo v. MelbergSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  2. Ransom-Ellis Co. v. EppelsheimerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  3. Wheeler Lumber Bridge and Supply Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1957
  4. Cambron v. MoyerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
  5. Adamson v. McKeonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API