Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Lemker

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 3, 1917PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Carroll District Court. — M. E. Hutchison, Judge. Action on account resulted in judgment as prayed. The defendant appeals. —

1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.

Recovery is sought against defendant on an account consisting of 54 items of merchandise and repairs. The sum of $20 had been paid, leaving $212.85, with interest from June 27, 1910, six months after the last item. The first 7 items, amounting to $81.75, were purchased by Wm. Gute, defendant’s son-in-law, who made the payment of $20, and all others by his son. Gute testified that defendant asked him to move on his farm, and, upon being informed that he did not have the tools, equipment and machinery to farm with, told him to procure such articles as lie' needed at the store of plaintiff and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Harlan v. HarlanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  2. Meginnes v. McChesneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  3. Langdon v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
  4. Regan v. KirkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kladivo v. MelbergSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  2. Clayman v. BiblerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  3. Richmann v. BeachSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  4. Goff v. MillironSupreme Court of Iowa · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API