Legal Opinion

Miller v. Adams

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 10, 1909PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from, Monroe District Court. — Hon. Frank W. Eichelberger, Judge. Action at law to recover compensation for services rendered Emma Adams, the wife of John Adams and the mother of Royal Adams. The defense was practically a general denial. The "case was tried to a jury, resulting in a judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtDeemer, J.

There is no doubt that plaintiff nursed Emma Adams and performed other services for her during the years 1905 and 1906, and the verdict, which was for $125, with interest, has sufficient support in the evidence, provided it be found that defendants are liable for *517the services so performed. It is contended for appellants, however, that the services were not rendered for them, and that they were not performed at their request. 'They further insist that the promise relied upon by plaintiff was within the statute of frauds, being a collateral one to answer for the debt of another, which was not…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Boykin v. Dohlonde & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1861
  2. Lusk v. ThroopIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Harlan v. HarlanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  4. Clark v. Jones & BrotherSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  5. Foster v. . PerschNew York Court of Appeals · 1877

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Goldie-Klenert Distributing Co. v. BothwellWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Frohardt Bros. v. DuffSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  3. Richmann v. BeachSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  4. Symons v. BurtonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1925
  5. Samuels Bros. v. FalwellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API