Legal Opinion

Ransom-Ellis Co. v. Eppelsheimer

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 13, 1928PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorling, J.

— The trial court rejected plaintiff’s offer of evidence of the reasonable value of the services alleged, and refused to submit to the jury plaintiff’s claim on quantum meruit, for the reason that plaintiff also pleaded and introduced evidence tending to establish an .express contract. These, in substance, are the ladings complained of.

Plaintiff pleaded in one count a cause of action on an express agreement to pay a commission of 5 per cent, and in another count, a cause of action on an employment not stated to be for a stipulated commission, but claiming- reasonable value of the services…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Williams v. Chicago, Santa Fe & California Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1892
  2. Way v. RootMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Moore v. H. Gaus & Sons Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1892
  4. Berry v. CraigSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  5. Holm v. Chicago, Milwaukee & Puget Sound Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Weaver Construction Co. v. Farmers National BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962
  2. Wells v. WildinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1938
  3. Mortenson v. Hawkeye Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1944
  4. Goben v. AkinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  5. In Re Estate of FlaugherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API