Kladivo v. Melberg
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtMorling, J.
The arguments here present two questions: First, whether the evidence is sufficient to support a finding of a consummated agreement between plaintiff and defendant; and second, if so, whether the agreement is within the statute of frauds.
While one of the grounds of motion to direct was, and defendant suggests in argument, that the agreement claimed by plaintiff to have been made was abandoned because defendant was not asked to sign and did not sign the note, no such defense is raised in the pleadings. Abandonment is the relinquishment, renunciation, or surrender of a right. Its existence…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Wood v. . Duff-GordonNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Davis v. PatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Emerson v. SlaterSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
- Wahl v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
- Bishop v. EatonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Maasdam v. Estate of MaasdamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1946
- O'Brien v. BieggerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
- McCarter v. UbanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
- LaFontaine v. Developers & Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1968
- In Re Lindsey's EstateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.