Legal Opinion

Adamson v. McKeon

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 14, 1929No. 39051PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorling, J.

For convenience, plaintiff and his assignors will be denominated “plaintiffs.” We disregard, as immaterial to the points under discussion, the alleged element of the agreement by which a $10 shortage on the basis of the alleged computation was to be borne by the five equally.

I. Defendant’s first proposition is that the contract alleged was between the makers of a promissory note to be bound thereon inter se in a proportion different from that equal liability implied by law, and, being oral, is not provable, ° under the promise to answer for the debt of an-_ . other clause of the statute ox…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mills v. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1860
  2. Richmann v. BeachSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  3. Townsend v. WhiteSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  4. Wilson v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
  5. W. T. Madden Co. v. F. Becker Asphaltum Roofing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1928

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Estate of Bayliss Ex Rel. Bowles v. LeeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Fithian v. JamarCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  3. Leonardi v. Habermann Provision Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API