Legal Opinion
Corus Staal BV v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided June 5, 2007No. Slip Op. 07-90; Court 07-00134PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CARMAN, Judge.
This opinion follows this Court’s decision from the bench on May 9, 2007, denying for lack of jurisdiction Plaintiffs Amended Motion for a Preliminary Injunction and dismissing the action without prejudice. Plaintiff, Corus Staal BV (“Corus”), sought an order enjoining the United States (the “Government”) from liquidating any unliq-uidated entries of certain hot-rolled carbon steel flat products (“HRCS”) from the Netherlands imported by Corus between November 1, 2005, through October 31, 2006 (referred to as “period-of-review five” or “POR 5”).
Corus, a Dutch steel…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Fmc Corporation and Monsanto Company v. The United States, and Rotem Fertilizers Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Zenith Radio Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Consolidated Bearings Company, Plaintiff-Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Miller & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Norsk Hydro Canada, Inc. v. United States, and U.S. Magnesium LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Ugine and Alz Belgium, NV v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
- Corus Staal BV v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008
- Tianjin Wanhua Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
- Corus Staal BV v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
- Juancheng Kangtai Chem. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.