Legal Opinion
Ugine and Alz Belgium, NV v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided October 1, 2007No. Slip Op. 07-145; Court 05-00444PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GREGORY W. CARMAN, Judge.
This matter is before this Court on motion for judgment upon the agency record and on motion to dismiss. Plaintiffs, Ugine & ALZ Belgium, N.V., Arcelor Stainless USA, LLC, and Arcelor Trading USA, LLC’s (together “Plaintiffs”), move pursuant to USCIT R. 56.1 to challenge certain final liquidation instructions 1 issued by the International Trade Administration of the U.S. Department of Commerce (“Government” or “Commerce” or “Defendant”) on the grounds that they are arbitrary, capricious or otherwise not in accordance with law. Commerce moves to dismiss…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Donald A. Henke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Zenith Radio Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Belgium v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Global Commodity Group LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Trustees in Bankruptcy of North American Rubber Thread Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
- AMS Assocites, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2012
- Bell Supply Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2015
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.