Legal Opinion
Corus Staal BV v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided September 19, 2007No. 1:95-s-01166PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JUDITH M. BARZILAY, Judge.
Plaintiff Corus Staal BV (“Corus”), moved this court for a preliminary injunction to enjoin the Defendant 1 United States (the “Government”) from liquidating certain entries of hot-rolled carbon steel flat products from the Netherlands (“HRCS”) that are subject to antidumping duties. See Antidumping Duty Order: Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products from the Netherlands, 66 Fed. Reg. 59,565 (Dep’t Commerce Nov. 29, 2001) CAD Order”). Corus has participated in several proceedings before the Court contesting the Government’s use of “zeroing” to calculate…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Fmc Corporation and Monsanto Company v. The United States, and Rotem Fertilizers Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Edmond v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Zenith Radio Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ugine and Alz Belgium, NV v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
- Corus Staal BV v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008
- United States v. Canex International Lumber Sales Ltd.United States Court of International Trade · 2008