Corus Staal BV v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
BARZILAY, Judge.
Plaintiff Corus Staal BV (“Corus”) challenges the imposition of antidumping duties by Defendant United States on certain entries of hot-rolled carbon steel (“HRCS”) flat products from the Netherlands in an administrative review of an antidumping duty order. 1 See Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products from the Netherlands; Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 72 Fed.Reg. 28,676 (Dep’t Commerce May 22, 2007) {“Final Results’); Certain Hotr-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products from the Netherlands; Amended Final Results of the Antidumping…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Murray v. Schooner Charming BetsySupreme Court of the United States · 1804
- Corus Staal BV v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Union Steel v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009
- Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2010
- Andaman Seafood Co., Ltd v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2010
- McC Eurochem v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011
- Acciaierie Valbruna S.p.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.