Legal Opinion

Corus Staal BV v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided December 29, 2008No. Slip Op. 08-144; Court 07-00221PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

BARZILAY, Judge.

Plaintiff Corus Staal BV (“Corus”) challenges the imposition of antidumping duties by Defendant United States on certain entries of hot-rolled carbon steel (“HRCS”) flat products from the Netherlands in an administrative review of an antidumping duty order. 1 See Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products from the Netherlands; Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 72 Fed.Reg. 28,676 (Dep’t Commerce May 22, 2007) {“Final Results’); Certain Hotr-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products from the Netherlands; Amended Final Results of the Antidumping…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Murray v. Schooner Charming BetsySupreme Court of the United States · 1804
  5. Corus Staal BV v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Union Steel v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009
  2. Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2010
  3. Andaman Seafood Co., Ltd v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2010
  4. McC Eurochem v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011
  5. Acciaierie Valbruna S.p.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API