Legal Opinion

Kyle v. Daniels

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 2000No. CV-00-0286-AP/ELPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JONES, Vice Chief Justice.

¶ 1 This is an expedited appeal. Accordingly, the matter was considered by a division of the court consisting of Chief Justice Zlaket, Vice Chief Justice Jones, and Justice Feldman. The court issued its dispositive order August 9, 2000, and indicated a formal opinion would follow. This is that opinion.

¶ 2 We are asked to decide whether A.R.S. § 16-312(D) (Supp.1999) prohibits a person from running for office as a write-in candidate in her party’s primary election after submitting an insufficient number of valid signatures on nominating petitions. Exercising…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hayes v. Continental InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Open Primary Elections Now v. BaylessArizona Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Board of Super. of Maricopa County v. Superior Court, in and for County of MaricopaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Moreno v. JonesArizona Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Bentley v. Building Our FutureCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  3. State v. BarnettCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  4. Pierce v. MoletCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  5. Thomas P. Morrissey v. Logan Stan GarnerArizona Supreme Court · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API