Legal Opinion

Pierce v. Molet

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 30, 2004No. 1 CA-CV 02-0353PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SULT, Judge.

¶ 1 Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) § 14-3720 (1995) permits a personal representative of a decedent’s estate to be reimbursed attorneys’ fees incurred in prosecuting or defending a claim, even though unsuccessfully, so long as the litigation is undertaken in good faith. The question raised in this appeal is whether our prior cases applying the statute have judicially engrafted a requirement that the personal representative also demonstrate that the litigation activities were a benefit to the estate. This opinion clarifies that “benefit to the estate” is not a statutory…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. Board of Medical ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
  2. Local 266, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Snow v. Western Savings & Loan Ass'nArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Lake Havasu City v. Mohave CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  5. In Re Estate of KlauzerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ruben M. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  2. In Re Guardianship of SleethCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  3. Piper Rudnick LLP v. HartzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  4. In Re U.S. Currency in the Amount of $2,390Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  5. State v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API