Pierce v. Molet
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SULT, Judge.
¶ 1 Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) § 14-3720 (1995) permits a personal representative of a decedent’s estate to be reimbursed attorneys’ fees incurred in prosecuting or defending a claim, even though unsuccessfully, so long as the litigation is undertaken in good faith. The question raised in this appeal is whether our prior cases applying the statute have judicially engrafted a requirement that the personal representative also demonstrate that the litigation activities were a benefit to the estate. This opinion clarifies that “benefit to the estate” is not a statutory…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Gilbert v. Board of Medical ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
- Local 266, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1954
- Snow v. Western Savings & Loan Ass'nArizona Supreme Court · 1987
- Lake Havasu City v. Mohave CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- In Re Estate of KlauzerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ruben M. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- In Re Guardianship of SleethCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- Piper Rudnick LLP v. HartzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- In Re U.S. Currency in the Amount of $2,390Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- State v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.