Open Primary Elections Now v. Bayless
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
McGREGOR, Justice.
¶ 1 On August 17, 1998, the Secretary of State, relying in part upon her rejection of signatures obtained by a petition circulator whom the Gila County Recorder (County Recorder) had disqualified, declared that Proposition 106, the Open Primary Initiative, lacked sufficient valid signatures to permit placing the initiative on the November 1998 general election ballot. Appellants attempted to challenge that decision by filing an action in superior court. We hold that appellants’ action was untimely because they failed to file it within the ten-day time limit defined by…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Canon School District No. 50 v. W.E.S. Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1994
- Valencia Energy Co. v. Arizona Department of RevenueArizona Supreme Court · 1998
- Heltzel v. Mecham PontiacArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- Pointe Resorts, Inc. v. CulbertsonArizona Supreme Court · 1988
3Cited by20 opinions
- John C. Lincoln Hospital v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- Long v. City of GlendaleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- Committee for Preservation of Established Neighborhoods v. RiffelCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- Forszt v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- Nordstrom, Inc. v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.