Bentley v. Building Our Future
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KESSLER, Judge.
¶ 1 Building Our Future (“BOF”) appeals the superior court’s holding that BOF violated Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 16-912.01 (2006) (“the Act”), and the court’s granting of summary judgment and awarding of 1.3 million dollars in favor of Linda Bentley and G. Russel Childress (“Bentley/Childress”).1 We hold that BOF’s advertisements supporting seven bond propositions were not “more than fifty percent devoted to ... the same subject,” as required for the disclosure provisions of the Act to apply. A.R.S. § 16-912.01QH). Accordingly, we vacate the judgment…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Hayes v. Continental InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- Janson v. ChristensenArizona Supreme Court · 1991
- Zamora v. ReinsteinArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- Kerby v. LuhrsArizona Supreme Court · 1934
- Canon School District No. 50 v. W.E.S. Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1994
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- ABCDW LLC v. BanningCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
- Arpaio v. Maricopa County Board of SupervisorsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- TDB Tucson Group, L.L.C. v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- Canyon Ambulatory Surgery Center v. SCF ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- State v. STRECKCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.