State v. Barnett
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRAMMER, J.
¶ 1 The state appeals from the trial court’s dismissal of prohibited possessor charges against appellee, Daniel James Alexander Barnett, based on the court’s interpretation of the phrase “release on any other basis” in A.R.S. § 13-3101(A)(6)(d). We affirm the dismissal.
Facts and Procedural History
¶ 2 On August 22, 2003, Barnett pled guilty in CR-20031221 to solicitation to unlawfully possess a narcotic drug and unlawful possession of drug paraphernalia. He was released from custody on his own recognizance awaiting sentencing, which was scheduled for September 9.
¶ 3 On…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. BoltonArizona Supreme Court · 1995
- Janson v. ChristensenArizona Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. BarnettArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. ThompsonArizona Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. GeorgeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Strawberry Water Co. v. PaulsenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- Cicoria v. ColeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Sierra Tucson Crc Health Group v. Louise LitwackCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- Lisa K. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.