Legal Opinion
Maher v. Tietex Corp.
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided May 11, 1998No. 2844PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CURETON, Judge:
Tietex Corporation (Tietex) appeals from a jury verdict against it in favor of William T. Maher (Maher), in Maher’s breach of contract suit against Tietex. Tietex asserts Maher’s breach of contract action is barred by the statute of limitations. We reverse and remand.
I. FACTS
Tietex is a company that manufactures a number of things including tickings, which is the fabric that covers mattresses. Prior to 1985, Tietex sold its fabric to middlemen who in turn sold it to mattress manufacturers. In 1985, Tietex formed its Tickings Division (Tickings), in order to skip the middlemen…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Dr. Julia Elizabeth Berry v. The Board of Supervisors of L.S.U., Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Jane Roe v. Jane Doe John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- Fleming v. Borden, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
- Santee Portland Cement Co. v. Daniel International Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
- Atlas Food Systems & Services, Inc. v. Crane National Vendors Division of Unidynamics Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Park Nicollet Clinic v. HamannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Moriarty v. Garden Sanctuary Church of GodSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Ingram v. Kasey's AssociatesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Architechtonics Construction Management, Inc. v. KhorramCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- Gustafson v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LPDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2013
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.