Legal Opinion
Santee Portland Cement Co. v. Daniel International Corp.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided June 5, 1989No. 23028PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Harwell, Justice:
This appeal involves the application of the “discovery rule” to contract actions. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
I. PACTS
On May 18, 1965, Santee Portland Cement Company (Santee) entered into a contract with Daniel International Corporation (Daniel) for the construction of a cement plant at Santee’s place of business in Orangeburg, South Carolina. The plant was to be constructed in accordance with plans and specifications prepared by Daniel. As part of the contract, Daniel and its sub-contractors constructed a cement storage silo complex consisting of twelve…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Davies v. KrasnaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- April Enterprises, Inc. v. KTTVCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Campus Sweater & Sportswear Co. v. M. B. Kahn Construction Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1979
- Brown v. FingerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
- Gattis v. ChavezDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Gust, Rosenfeld & Henderson v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaArizona Supreme Court · 1995
- Individual Healthcare Specialists, Inc. v. Bluecross Blueshield of Tennessee, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2019
- Dean v. Ruscon Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
- Moriarty v. Garden Sanctuary Church of GodSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Bauman v. DayAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.