Legal Opinion
Jane Roe v. Jane Doe John Doe
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided June 29, 1994No. 93-1991PublishedCited by 91 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRINKEMA, District Judge:
The plaintiff-appellant appeals from the district court’s summary judgment for defendants based on the court’s holding that her personal injury action was barred by South Carolina’s statute of limitations. The district court found that appellant failed to commence her action within three years of the date by which a person of common knowledge and experience would be on notice that *406she might have a cause of action. The issue before us is whether the South Carolina statute of limitations and discovery rule should be applied differently to plaintiffs in repressed…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by91 opinions
- Teague v. BakkerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- Lynn v. Monarch Recovery Management, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2013
- Raymond Porter v. United States Alumoweld Company, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- Monumental Paving & Excavating, Incorporated v. Pennsylvania Manufacturers' Association Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- Moriarty v. Garden Sanctuary Church of GodSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.