Legal Opinion

Architechtonics Construction Management, Inc. v. Khorram

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 13, 2002No. 48181-9-IPublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEllington, J.

We must decide whether the discovery rule applies in contract cases. We hold it does, and that the statute of limitation for an action for breach of contract begins to run when a party knows or, in the exercise of due diligence should know, of the breach. Here, Parviz and Ladan Khorram filed suit within two years of the first signs of a breach. The statute of limitation does not bar their claim, and we reverse summary judgment.

FACTS

Parviz and Ladan Khorram contracted with Kensington Homes, Inc., (Kensington) to construct their home. Kensington built the home according to the design and plans…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Ruth v. DightWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Barmat v. John and Jane Doe Partners ADArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Ehrenhaft v. Malcolm Price, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Ohler v. Tacoma General HospitalWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Gust, Rosenfeld & Henderson v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaArizona Supreme Court · 1995

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. 1000 Virginia Ltd. Partnership v. Vertecs Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
  2. 1000 Virginia Ltd. Partnership v. Vertecs Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Harmony at Madrona Park Owners Ass'n v. Madison Harmony Development, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  4. Harmony at Madrona Park Owners Ass'n v. Madison Harmony Development, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  5. Kinney v. CookCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API