Legal Opinion
Mileikowsky v. Tenet Healthsystem
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 4, 2005No. B159733PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CURRY, J.
Appellant Gil Mileikowsky, M.D., appeals from an order which granted (1) a request for terminating sanctions, and (2) a request for $8,500 in monetary sanctions. The order was based on his repeated failure to provide discovery. For the reasons set forth herein, the court’s order is affirmed.
Although an order granting a request for terminating sanctions is not appealable and the losing party should ordinarily await entry of the order of dismissal to file notice of appeal, we denied a motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds of prematurity because an order granting monetary…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Blanton v. Womancare, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1985
- Vallbona v. SpringerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Do It Urself Moving & Storage, Inc. v. Brown, Leifer, Slatkin & BernsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Bowden v. GreenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Security Pacific National Bank v. BradleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Doppes v. Bentley Motors, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- Doe v. United States Swimming, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- New Albertsons, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Nickell v. MatlockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Parker v. Wolters Kluwer United States, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.