Parker v. Wolters Kluwer United States, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JOHNSON, Acting P. J .
After previous orders and monetary sanctions failed to bring about Leonard O. Parker’s compliance with the discovery process the trial court sanctioned Parker by dismissing his complaint against all defendants and entered his default on the cross-complaint brought by two of the defendants. Parker appeals from the ensuing judgment and challenges the validity of the underlying discovery orders which led to it.
We affirm the judgment in part and reverse it in part. We reverse one of the monetary sanction orders. We hold the trial court erred in imposing terminating…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- People v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Paterno v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Deyo v. KilbourneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Tilbury Constructors, Inc. v. State Compensation Insurance FundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Mileikowsky v. Tenet HealthsystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Lenore Albert-Sheridan v. State Bar of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Tucker v. PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SERVICESCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Pratt v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Osborne v. Todd Farm ServiceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Attard v. Bd. of Supervisors of Contra Costa Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.