Legal Opinion
Doe v. United States Swimming, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 21, 2011No. H036240PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1427Opinion
ELIA, J.
Defendant United States Swimming, Inc. (U.S. Swimming) appeals from an order directing it to pay monetary sanctions in the amount of $5,250 to plaintiff Jane Doe. The superior court found that U.S. Swimming, without substantial justification, failed to comply with its August 6, 2010 discovery order and opposed plaintiff’s motion to compel compliance with that order. (Code Civ. Proc., § 904.1, subd. (a)(ll), (12).)1
On appeal, U.S. Swimming argues that imposition of monetary sanctions was an abuse of discretion since it had complied with the August 6, 2010 discovery order and the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Gonzaga University v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Griset v. Fair Political Practices CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Valley Bank of Nevada v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Pioneer Electronics (USA), Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Rutledge v. Hewlett-Packard Co.California Court of Appeal · 2015
- Nickell v. MatlockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Padron v. Watchtower Bible & Tract Soc'y of N.Y., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- City of Los Angeles v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Judge v. Nijjar Realty, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2014
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.