Bowden v. Green
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SPARKS, J.
The question presented is whether a judgment is valid when it is inadvertently signed by the trial judge but correctly reflects the undisclosed stipulation of counsel. We hold that the answer depends upon the validity of the stipulation; if valid, such a judgment cannot be attacked on appeal; if invalid, the judgment is correctable.(2) Defendant appeals from an order denying the “Motion to Correct Judgment.” He sought to correct the judgment on the ground of clerical error. Because we conclude that the stipulation was invalid, we reverse.
Facts
In July 1976 plaintiffs 2 filed…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- In Re CandelarioCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Linsk v. LinskCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Estate of GoldbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Navrides v. Zurich InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Bice v. StevensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Blanton v. Womancare, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1985
- Stewart v. Preston Pipeline Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- Mileikowsky v. Tenet HealthsystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Mayer v. C.W. DriverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- In Re Marriage of HassoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.