Legal Opinion

Security Pacific National Bank v. Bradley

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 3, 1992No. B047406PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

JOHNSON, J.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff granted solely on the ground defendant failed to file a separate responsive statement pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 437c, subdivision (b). We hold, under the particular circumstances of this case, the court abused its discretion by failing to afford defendant a further opportunity to file a proper separate statement.

Facts and Proceedings Below

Plaintiff, Security Pacific National Bank (Bank), filed an action in January 1985 in the Los Angeles County Superior Court alleging breach of a loan…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Leal v. Holy Spirit Ass'n for Unification of World ChristianityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Corwin v. Los Angeles Newspaper Service Bureau, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Bullis v. Security Pacific National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. United Community Church v. GarcinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Elkins v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Teselle v. McLoughlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. Parkview Villas Ass'n v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 2005
  4. Mileikowsky v. Tenet HealthsystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  5. Kalivas v. Barry Controls Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1996

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API