Legal Opinion

Rueth v. State

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1982No. 13650PublishedCited by 95 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McFADDEN, Justice.

Herbert and Kathleen Rueth brought an inverse condemnation action against the Idaho Fish and Game Department. The action arises out of the Department’s operation of a water diversion structure, which allegedly caused the water table on the Rueths’ property to be raised so that their land has been flooded from subsurface percolation, “effectpng] a complete loss of value of said lands of plaintiffs and, therefore, constitutes a taking of said lands of plaintiffs by defendants.” The district court entered judgment on a jury verdict in favor of the Rueths on their inverse…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Minich v. Gem State Developers, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Watson Lumber Co. v. GuennewigAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967
  3. Tibbs v. City of SandpointIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Jensen v. BledsoeIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Rueth v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by95 opinions

  1. Perry v. Magic Valley Regional Medical CenterIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Andre v. MorrowIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. PrattIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Sun Valley Shamrock Resources, Inc. v. Travelers Leasing Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990
  5. MacNeil v. Minidoka Memorial HospitalIdaho Supreme Court · 1985

90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API