Legal Opinion
Greenberg v. City of Waterbury
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 20, 1933PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBanks, J.
On October 4th, 1931, plaintiff's decedent fell upon the sidewalk on North Elm Street in the defendant city, which it is claimed was defective, and sustained injuries which it is claimed resulted in his death. One of the principal contentions of the defendant is that no notice of the place of the injury was given that complied with the requirements of the statute. General Statutes, § 1420. The statute requires that a written notice of the injury “and a general description of the same, and of the cause thereof and of the time and place of its occurrence” shall be given within sixty days,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Springer v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
- McGar v. Borough of BristolSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
- Wladyka. v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
- G. F. Heublein, Inc. v. Board of Street CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Delaney v. Waterbury & Milldale Tramway Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Saphir v. NeustadtSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Conservation Commission v. PriceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- State v. I'ANSONAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Yeager and Sullivan, Inc. v. O'NEILLIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
- Dickson v. Yale UniversitySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.