State ex rel. Lum v. Archibald
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by the respondent below from an order of the district court for Crow Wing county, Holland, J., presiding, directing the issuance of a peremptory writ of mandamus.
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.
This is an appeal from an order directing that a peremptory writ of mandamus issue, addressed to the defendant, an assessor, requiring and compelling him, as such, to proceed with the assessment of real and personal property in certain territory alleged to be a part of Crow Wing county. The controversy arises by reason of the passage of an act entitled “An act relating to the change of county lines of unorganized counties, and annexation of unorganized territory to organized counties,” which was approved on February *32925, 1887, now known as chapter 119, Gen. Laws of that year; and the passage of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Wood v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
- Chew Heong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- State v. StollSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- State ex rel. Currie v. WeldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- Iverson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Graham & Foster v. GoodcellSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- State Ex Rel. Smith v. HavelandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- People Ex Rel. Kell v. KramerIllinois Supreme Court · 1928
- State Ex Rel. Gillespie v. ThursbySupreme Court of Florida · 1932
- Watkins v. HuffTexas Supreme Court · 1901
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.