Legal Opinion

People v. Frayer

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 9, 1956No. Crim. 3196PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

Appellant was found guilty of pimping (Pen. Code, § 266b) and was granted probation. He appeals from the final judgment, which is the order granting proba tion (Pen. Code, § 1237, subd. 1). The only question presented by the appeal is whether the prostitute from whose earnings defendant was found to have lived and who was the main witness at the trial, was an accomplice whose testimony required corroboration (Pen. Code, §1111). Appellant’s contentions that for lack of such corroboration the evidence did not support the verdict and that the court erred in refusing the instructions offered by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. MontgomeryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  2. People v. De PaulaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. People v. WilkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. People v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. People v. SimpsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Tellis v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Williams v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  3. People v. WilkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. People v. BergerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. People v. PangelinaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API