Legal Opinion
People v. Pangelina
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 27, 1981No. Crim. 20187PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NEWSOM, J.
The present appeal arises under the following circumstances.
An indictment returned by the Santa Clara Grand Jury on August 30, 1978, charged appellants and four named codefendants with conspiracy (Pen. Code, § 182) to keep a house of prostitution (Pen. Code, § 315). On September 13, 1978, appellants were arraigned, entered a plea of not guilty, and waived time; they did not, however, join with their codefendants in expressly reserving the right to demur.
On October 16, 1978, codefendant Gloria Washington made various pretrial motions, including motions for a postindictment…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Krulewitch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- People v. PopeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Callanan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Gebardi v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- People v. MoranteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. YuCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- People v. LeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- People v. Martin, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- People v. Brown, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.